[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#484635: marked as done (packages.debian.org: incorrect "also a virtual package" note)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:49:40 +0200
with message-id <20081024184940.GA17082@dirac.djpig.de>
and subject line Fixes online
has caused the Debian Bug report #475066,
regarding packages.debian.org: incorrect "also a virtual package" note
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
475066: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475066
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: www.debian.org


Hi,

This page: http://packages.debian.org/sid/gnupg
has the following text:

xloadimage  [not hppa, hurd-i386, ia64, sparc]
    Graphics file viewer under X11
or imagemagick
    image manipulation programs
    also a virtual package provided by graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
or eog
    Eye of GNOME graphics viewer program
    also a virtual package provided by graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat

But eog is not provided by graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat, rather, it
seems that that line is inadvertently repeated from the imagemagick bullet
right above it, which is correct.


Thijs

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
The fixes for these bugs are now online at packages.debian.org

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: