[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CVS webwml/english/devel



On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:58:42PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine <frankie@debian.org> [2008-10-06 12:16:34 CEST]:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:58:07AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, den 03.10.2008, 14:43 -0600 schrieb CVS User frankie:
> > > > -        <dt><a href="$(DOC)/developers-reference/resources#s-incoming-system">\
> > > > +        <dt><a href="$(DOC)/developers-reference/resources.html#incoming-system">\
> > > 
> > >  Erm, pardon? Why did you change that link? It was completely valid,
> > > what was the problem with that?
> > 
> > It is now pointing to sec 4.8 (incoming system), before that it was pointing to the
> > beginning of chapter 4 (resources) because that tag did not exist.
> 
>  Ah, right - only noticed the addition of the .html (which might work
> against content negotiation, but I checked, it's done with .html.fr in
> there so it's fine ...) but didn't see the change to stripp off the s-
> from the anchor.
> 
>  Still wonder, do we need (or rather, want) the additional .html in
> here? Is it needed? Might it influence future content negotiation
> changes? Propably not, but I think it's common that we only link to the
> short name without any extensions here.
> 
Indeed it works without the html suffix. I simply did a cut&past without
stripping it, my fault. Contents negotiation should work with or without
the suffix anyway.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine


Reply to: