[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#362703: marked as done (packages.d.o: package database is lagging behind unstable)

Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:55:38 +0200
with message-id <20070902185538.GA21711@dirac.djpig.de>
and subject line New packages.debian.org version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.20
Severity: normal


The following version error seems mistaken:

    % reportbug -b freeguide
    < stuff deleted >

    Getting status for freeguide...
    Verifying package integrity...
    Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
    Your version of freeguide (0.10.3-1) is newer than that in Debian! Do you still want to
    file a report [y|N|q|?]?

...because my new 'freeguide' is Debian's:

    % zcat /usr/share/doc/freeguide/changelog.Debian.gz | head
    freeguide (0.10.3-1) unstable; urgency=low

      * New upstream release.
      * Use ant to install the package to debian/tmp.
      * Help/About links work. Closes: #288526.
      * Load font preferences at startup. Closes: #288517.
      * Check for valid widget size. Closes: #288528.

     -- Shaun Jackman <sjackman@debian.org>  Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:40:22 -0600

I'm guessing either the 'freeguide' package is configured funny,
or 'reportbug' is confused, or both -- apologies if it's not
'reportbug'.

Hope this helps...



-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="mcedit"
EMAIL="agcosta@gis.net"

** /home/alfie/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "3.2"
mode standard
ui text
realname "A Costa"
email "agcosta@gis.net"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii  python2.3                     2.3.5-9.1  An interactive high-level object-o

Versions of packages reportbug recommends:
ii  python2.3-iconvcodec          1.1.2-2    Python universal Unicode codec, us

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I installed a new code version on packages.debian.org today and I
believe it fixes the following bugs:

#87725: packages.debian.org: suggesting new links to access package web
pages 

	Package URLs don't need to include the section anymore.

#364312: www.debian.org: new packages.d.o/changelog:$PACKAGE doesn't
work with libraries 

	The changelog package map is now updated more reliably.

#402911: md5sum is part of the url of packages.debian.org

	The download page now gets all information directly from the database.

#335011: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org isn't dynamic 

	Most of the content of packages.debian.org is now generated
	dynamically. Update times should get reduced dramatically.

#354920: Symlinks for release numbers and codenames on
packages.debian.org 

	packages.d.o now uses codenames by default and accepts
	suite names and version numbers as aliases

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: