Re: Bug#322696: www.debian.org: WWW Pages license link broken
On 2005-08-12T16:03:20+0300, email@example.com wrote:
> Tommi Vainikainen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It's not worth relicensing from one set of non-free terms to
> another, unless you think the current licence is harder to
> understand than the longer CC licences, or something. With any
> luck, there'll be a free-software-ready CC soon.
Hmm, maybe I should read CC licenses sometime. :-/
Also noticed that my report was rather technical (broken link), but
there has been for a long time other report #238245.
Maybe this should be discussed with -legal and have some kind of
recommendation of good license? GNU GPL?
>> Is this how hard to change? Now it says that SPI has all copyright.
> If that is true, I think it just needs DPL to ask SPI relicense.
Well, I know as a translators that I've never assigned (in any formal
way) copyrights to SPI, but the web pages now clearly say that SPI has