[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Some weirdness on debian release sites



Hello,

today I noticed some weirdness on debian sites
(maybe it's all correct as it is?):



On
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/powerpc/index.en.html

Woody is mentioned as supported distribution, but the
link to the installation manual links to Sarge-Manual.

--snip
Debian PowerPC port was first officially released with Debian GNU/Linux
2.2 (`potato'). Support for PowerPC is maintained in the release 3.0
(`woody'). Please see the  release notes and installation manual for
more information.
--snap

=================================================================

On
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/s390/index.en.html

contains old release infos (woody):

--snip
The normal Debian channels for acquiring installation media should have
S/390 available shortly, now that Debian 3.0 (woody) is released.
--snap

=================================================================

On
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/hppa/

contains old release infos (woody):

--snip
The normal Debian channels for acquiring installation media should have
HPPA available shortly, now that Debian 3.0 (woody) is released
--snap

=================================================================

On several "ports" sites as
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/alpha/index.en.html
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/arm/index.en.html
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/i386/index.en.html
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/powerpc/index.en.html
http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/sparc/index.en.html

there are links to the installation manual, that show the txt version
of the manual. Maybe this is intended? Using the html version would be
better.



Greetings
Holger

-- 
==============================================================
Created with Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4
    under Debian GNU/LINUX 3.1 Sarge - NOW STABLE!
        http://counter.li.org/,  Registered LinuxUser #311290
		Spamfiltering by www.spamassassin.org
=============================================================



Reply to: