[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#296426: marked as done (port-status page and ppc floppies)



Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:57:25 -0500
with message-id <20050224205725.GB12156@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#296426: port-status page and ppc floppies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 13:07:03 +0000
>From debian@layer-acht.org Tue Feb 22 05:07:03 2005
Return-path: <debian@layer-acht.org>
Received: from bone.digitalis.org [212.12.48.27] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D3Zkl-0004OW-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:07:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (bone [127.0.0.1])
	by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63285329946
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:06:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bone.digitalis.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (bone [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 05451-05 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:06:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from matrix.athome (c144075.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.144.75])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205E7329944
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:06:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: port-status page and ppc floppies
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:06:19 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1525699.3oes288QfJ";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200502221406.29996.debian@layer-acht.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at digitalis.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--nextPart1525699.3oes288QfJ
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

package: debian-installer

Hi,

http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ports-status.en.html for power=
pc=20
oldword only shows  four types of boot images (businesscard CD, netinst CD,=
=20
netboot, floppy) and misses the 2.4-floppies.

IMHO this also leads to the confused comment "working(?), but legal problem=
s".

IMHO there should be two rows:

ppc-oldworld-floppies  no successful reports, please report! legal problems=
=20
with miboot
ppc-oldworld-floppies-2.4 working, but legal problems with miboot

I have never had success with the 2.6-pmac-bootfloppy myself (last tried on=
=20
2005-02-21) and svenl did confirm this. (He remembered some success in=20
Oldenburg but hat stopped working mysteriously.)

BTW, why hasn't the oldworld netboot image been part of rc2 ? Or of more=20
interest: will the oldworld netboot image be part of rc3 ?


regards,
 Holger

--nextPart1525699.3oes288QfJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCGy5VUHLQNqxYNSARAr2GAJwO3vqxDTZxZ2AXiG84xEtAfV0ngwCgjrfc
QOKhlmPtH1HRsMtJAqBnHOw=
=x7CK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1525699.3oes288QfJ--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296426-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 20:54:53 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Thu Feb 24 12:54:53 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D4Q0b-0006Zt-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:54:53 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE9717F20;
	Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:54:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1CEDB6F031; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:57:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:57:25 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Cc: 296426-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#296426: port-status page and ppc floppies
Message-ID: <20050224205725.GB12156@kitenet.net>
References: <200502221406.29996.debian@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] 200502241252.03210.holger@layer-acht.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200502241252.03210.holger@layer-acht.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 296426-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Holger Levsen wrote:
> the attached patch to port-status.wml adds this additional row to oldworl=
d. it=20
> also has the two different comments. (which will help people looking for=
=20
> working floppies on oldworld - and should also help to receive floppy-2.6=
=20
> installation reports one day...)

Done. Thanks for the patch.

--=20
see shy jo

--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCHj+1d8HHehbQuO8RAszKAJ97OdnRhULW+GrdF+Q/4yxpSJ8R3ACcDzkH
h1/zWVR2v9uM845oOWA2I6A=
=016b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz--



Reply to: