Bug#269189: marked as done (Mail server reference card is outdated)
Your message dated Sun, 3 Oct 2004 18:23:31 +0200
with message-id <20041003162331.GE3914@feynman>
and subject line Bug#269189: Mail server reference card is outdated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 09:41:56 +0000
>From lool@bee.dooz.org Tue Aug 31 02:41:56 2004
Return-path: <lool@bee.dooz.org>
Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.27]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C259I-00021Z-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 02:41:56 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP
id B518B5000353; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bee.dooz.org (APuteaux-152-1-1-146.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.127.1.146])
by mwinf0403.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id 7D64E50002A6; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3CC996839227; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:41:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:41:27 +0200
From: Loic Minier <lool@dooz.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Mail server reference card is outdated
Message-ID: <20040831094127.GA4268@via.ecp.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.64
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi,
I think the mail server reference card is outdated, for two reasons:
- it states that you can't merge bugs which don't have the exact same
tags, but you can (see below),
- it seems you can include multiple tags on the same "tags" line, but
there is some mis-parsing.
Now to give an example of the above problems, I was about to merge
197265 and 269115, with this:
tags 269115 +patch +upstream
merge 197265 269115
thanks
But got:
> tags 269115 +patch +upstream
Unknown tag/s: +upstream.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato
woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore
experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental
fixed-upstream l10n.
Which is surprising: it seems the tag is somehow parsed, but the fact
that it has a leading + doesn't match the list.
But then, the merge succeeded:
> merge 197265 269115
Bug#197265: rxvt: segfault on exit (race condition)
Bug#269115: segfault upon startup
Merged 197265 269115.
(But the mail server reference cards says the tags must be identical
prior merging.)
Regards,
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 269189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2004 16:24:05 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Sun Oct 03 09:24:05 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.169.191] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CE99Y-0003L4-00; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 09:24:05 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107])
by mail.lenk.info with esmtp
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CE9Cz-0000Kz-R6
for <269189-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:27:37 +0200
Received: from pd9e39cb5.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.156.181] helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CE9Ai-0000f6-J0
for <269189-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:25:17 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CE991-0001mB-E4
for 269189-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:23:31 +0200
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 18:23:31 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 269189-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#269189: Mail server reference card is outdated
Message-ID: <20041003162331.GE3914@feynman>
References: <20040831094127.GA4268@via.ecp.fr> <20040831155656.GB16699@riva.ucam.org> <20040831162238.GA4581@via.ecp.fr> <20040918142820.GF1903@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040918142820.GF1903@djpig.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 269189-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 04:28:20PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> diff -u -r1.43 server-control.wml
> --- server-control.wml 17 Sep 2004 05:09:43 -0000 1.43
> +++ server-control.wml 18 Sep 2004 14:25:28 -0000
> @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@
> If they don't start out in the same state you should use
> <code>reassign</code>, <code>reopen</code> and so forth to make sure
> that they are before using <code>merge</code>. Titles are not required
> -to match, and will not be affected by the merge.</p>
> +to match, and will not be affected by the merge. Tags are not required
> +to match, too, they will be joined.</p>
>
> <P>If any of the bugs listed in a <code>merge</code> command is already
> merged with another bug then all the reports merged with any of the
>
> Proposals for better wording welcome.
Since there were none, I committed the patch.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: