Bug#271443: marked as done (www.debian.org: please include pseudo-package for bugs on each page)
Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:01:07 +0200
with message-id <2004-09-14_11.01.03@alfie.ist.org>
and subject line Bug#271443: www.debian.org: please include pseudo-package for bugs on each page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2004 08:08:22 +0000
>From madduck@cirrus.madduck.net Mon Sep 13 01:08:22 2004
Return-path: <madduck@cirrus.madduck.net>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C6lss-0007Wt-00; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 01:08:22 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1A2895D8A
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:08:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (80-219-173-32.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.173.32])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id D5317895D77
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:08:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5652725FB6A; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:08:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:08:21 +0200
From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: please include pseudo-package for bugs on each page
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040913080821.GA13039@cirrus.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.8-1-k7 i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Most debian.org webpages use the www.debian.org pseudo package for
bugs. Some don't. It would be great if every page in debian.org
would state at the bottom something akin to:
"Found an error? Report a bug against 'www.debian.org'"
Or am I to file bugs against, e.g. packages.qa.debian.org also
against www.debian.org?
Anyway, a statement such as the above would possibly encourage our
users to report errors they spot, even if only very little.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8
--=20
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBRVV1IgvIgzMMSnURAtYsAJ9BasQNjA738Hi0q7sF2aDFYT77gQCgxfN7
7kZORdAU4Kz4WFYv7QC75mc=
=+cX/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 271443-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2004 09:01:23 +0000
>From alfie@ist.org Tue Sep 14 02:01:23 2004
Return-path: <alfie@ist.org>
Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C79Bj-0003wi-00; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:01:23 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] helo=tausendmorgenwald)
by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C79BU-00055K-00; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:01:08 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C79BT-0002UD-00; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:01:07 +0200
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:01:07 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org>
To: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>, 271443-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#271443: www.debian.org: please include pseudo-package for bugs on each page
Message-ID: <2004-09-14_11.01.03@alfie.ist.org>
References: <[🔎] 20040913080821.GA13039@cirrus.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040913080821.GA13039@cirrus.madduck.net>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s !:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,\IfUUY*hqPGSo%8WnAh7_6P@Clt8^Vy` {3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org>
Delivered-To: 271443-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> [2004-09-13 10:08]:
> Most debian.org webpages use the www.debian.org pseudo package for
> bugs. Some don't. It would be great if every page in debian.org
> would state at the bottom something akin to:
From the bottom of a www.debian.org page:
,----------------------------> quote <----------------------------
| To report a problem with the web site, e-mail
| debian-www@lists.debian.org.
`----------------------------> quote <----------------------------
> Or am I to file bugs against, e.g. packages.qa.debian.org also
> against www.debian.org?
From the bottom of packages.qa.debian.org:
,----------------------------> quote <----------------------------
| If you have questions or comments about the PTS, please contact
| [Rapha=EBl Hertzog].
`----------------------------> quote <----------------------------
(where "Rapha=EBl Hertzog" is a link to his mail address)
And from the page you complained also about, db.debian.org:
,----------------------------> quote <----------------------------
| You can contact us at admin@db.debian.org.
`----------------------------> quote <----------------------------
> Anyway, a statement such as the above would possibly encourage our
> users to report errors they spot, even if only very little.
Very little indeed, as even the people suggesting such a thing don't
read the pages.
Much luck to you, I'm closing the bugreport. If you find a page where
such a thing isn't in the footer feel free to reopen it so we can track
down for you whom to bug to add.
So long,
Alfie
--=20
"Die Angabe des vollst=E4ndigen Realnamens erleichtert die Kommunikation
im Usenet ungemein, man kann sich dann n=E4mlich auf die Inhalte der
Postings konzentrieren und mu=DF nicht =FCber Sinn/Unsinn von Pseudonymen
o.=E4. diskutieren." (Ingo Lie=DFegang, de.newusers.questions, 6.10.1999)
--4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBRrNSMU96lewVKUIRAq6NAJsHRqt4UiZMjGZ5YPvhPsuvlCeknwCeMUrV
+w0zShMAAMtJOMnrX52J06c=
=9nvL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4Epv4kl9IRBfg3rk--
Reply to: