Bug#271220: marked as done (confusing statement about logging)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:44:19 +0200
with message-id <20040917004419.GL2514@djpig.de>
and subject line Bug#271220: confusing statement about logging
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2004 23:05:43 +0000
>From madduck@cirrus.madduck.net Sat Sep 11 16:05:43 2004
Return-path: <madduck@cirrus.madduck.net>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C6GwA-0002Lc-00; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:05:43 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 18B54895D8C
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:05:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (80-219-173-32.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.173.32])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id B0895895D8B
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:05:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3FBF3201C60; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:05:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 01:05:33 +0200
From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: confusing statement about logging
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040911230533.GA24905@cirrus.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.8-1-k7 i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-request
The body you send should be a series of commands, one per line.
You'll receive a reply which looks like a transcript of your
message being interpreted, with a response to each command. No
notifications are sent to anyone for most commands; however, the
messages are logged and made available in the WWW pages.
This should probably be changed so that it's clear that only
changing requests are logged. Moreover, since the request one can
send to request@bugs.d.o are all non-changing, I don't think the
statement belongs here. In fact,
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not state this, so
I think it should be moved.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8
--=20
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBQ4S9IgvIgzMMSnURApzLAJ43d4zEB/fvDuc8YKyWU/QPFrljgQCaA2oT
WDdcthjsbYv4+wBw7BYkjuQ=
=BnkP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 271220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2004 00:44:59 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Thu Sep 16 17:44:59 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C86rz-0004WP-00; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:44:59 -0700
Received: from p54808494.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.128.132.148] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1C86u6-0008SQ-DB
for <271220-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:47:10 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C86rM-0004h0-00
for <271220-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:44:20 +0200
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 02:44:19 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 271220-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#271220: confusing statement about logging
Message-ID: <20040917004419.GL2514@djpig.de>
References: <[🔎] 20040911230533.GA24905@cirrus.madduck.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040911230533.GA24905@cirrus.madduck.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 271220-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 01:05:33AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-request
>
> The body you send should be a series of commands, one per line.
> You'll receive a reply which looks like a transcript of your
> message being interpreted, with a response to each command. No
> notifications are sent to anyone for most commands; however, the
> messages are logged and made available in the WWW pages.
>
> This should probably be changed so that it's clear that only
> changing requests are logged. Moreover, since the request one can
> send to request@bugs.d.o are all non-changing, I don't think the
> statement belongs here. In fact,
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control does not state this, so
> I think it should be moved.
fixed.
Thx,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: