Hi, On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:47:32PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Pierre Machard <pmachard@debian.org> [2004-07-15 08:55]: > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:58:11AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: > >> Package: www.debian.org > >> Severity: normal > >> Tags: patch > >> > >> We can use the last eight hex digits of the *fingerprint* in this and > >> other GnuPG operations and not the last eight hex digits of the *key*. > >> Or am I wrong? > > This is only true for special keys.... In fact its the last eight hex > digits of the *key ID*. That they match the fingerprint for gnupg keys > is a nice benefit, but not the rule for all keys. Do you example of keys where this is not the case ? > The whole texting though is quite GnuPG centric, so I am not sure if > this distinction is really needed here. Just wanted to raise the > concern and that sometimes the last eight hex digits of the fingerprint > doesn't help at all. Probably, but I suppose that nearly everybody is using gnupg. A very few people are using pgp those days. > > You are right. I've just fixed it in the CVS. It should be available on > > our website in several hours. > > Pierre, are you sure about this change that it is really better? Yes it is. Because, it is sure that the last 8 digits are not those of the key. In most cases these digits are the last 8 digits of the fingerprint. Do not forget that in the beginning we were speaking of the 8 lastest digit of the key. Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <pmachard@debian.org> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature