Hello, I found that the notation of license is swinging between "license" and "licence". $ grep -c licens index.wml 21 $ grep -c licenc index.wml 3 I guess "license" and "licence" are both ok, however, it is better to be unified. I'd prefer to "license". The patch below will fix this problem. regards, -- Nobuhiro IMAI <nov@yo.rim.or.jp> Key fingerprint = F39E D552 545D 7C64 D690 F644 5A15 746C BD8E 7106 --- index.wml~ 2004-06-30 11:20:01.000000000 +0900 +++ index.wml 2004-07-06 22:45:55.000000000 +0900 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Guidelines</a> (DFSG). Most of these opinions were formed in discussions on the <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/";>\ debian-legal mailing list</a> in response to questions from -potential package maintainers or licence users. You may +potential package maintainers or license users. You may <a href="mailto:debian-legal@lists.debian.org";>contact debian-legal</a> if you have questions or comments about these summaries.</p> @@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ Foundation</a> (FSF) and the <a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html";>Open Source Initiative</a> (OSI). Please note however, that the Debian project -decides on particular packages rather than licences in abstract, +decides on particular packages rather than licenses in abstract, and the following are just general explanations when possible. It is possible to have a package containing software under one of -these licences with some other aspect that makes it non-free.</p> +these licenses with some other aspect that makes it non-free.</p> <p>We provide three lists that differ in how they are sorted:</p>
Attachment:
pgpGbz13BkKzm.pgp
Description: PGP signature