* Peter Karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se> [2004-07-02 06:31]: > IMHO six months without any reaction from the translation team *is* > "way too out-dated". Personally, I would have liked to have the limit > be even stricter. Seconed. > The translation-check header is already used- when the translation > falls behind, it gets a notice on the page, and after six months the > translation is purged. We do get enough complaints and bug reports > about broken links and misinformation which is due to translations not > being updated in time that I believe that the current practice is > warranted. The thing is quite clear documented on /devel/website/translation_hints: ,--------------------------------> quote <-------------------------------- | It is important that you only translate files that you have the time to | maintain. A few well maintained pages is much more useful than a lot of | out of date ones. `--------------------------------> quote <-------------------------------- It is even written in bold letters... If I might pick this up: Can the translators of the following languages pretty please update their CD/http-ftp/index.wml file, it fails to build due to being outdated: -) dutch -) italian -) spanish (hey, Javier!) Thanks in advance, Alfie P.S.: The build failure occurs because english/CD/http-ftp/cdimage_fsn_mirrors.list isn't there anmore but still referenced in these translations. -- shit, fixed, updated. -- Michael Bramer, debian-www, <20030801123841.GA6863@home.debsupport.de>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature