Re: [Patch] l10n tag is not described in http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> [2004-05-28 10:55] :
> > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 10:18:13PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Bothamy wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I noticed that the l10n tag for the BTS is not described in the Debian
> > > BTS developer info. The following patch should correct this:
> >
> > Don't forget Bugs/server-refcard.wml
>
> Ok, I have looked in the directory Bugs/ and found some interestings
> things.
>
> The complete list of tags is currently:
> potato, woody, sarge, sarge-ignore, sid, experimental, confirmed, d-i,
> fixed, fixed-in-experimental, fixed-upstream, help, l10n, moreinfo,
> patch, pending, security, unreproducible, upstream, wontfix, ipv6, lfs.
>
> The page Developer.wml is missing the following tags:
> fixed-in-experimental and l10n.
>
> The page server-refcard.wml is missing the following tags: sarge-ignore,
> confirmed, d-i, fixed-in-experimental, fixed-upstream, l10n, ipv6 and
> lfs.
>
> The page server-control.wml is missing the following tags: sarge-ignore,
> fixed-in-experimental, fixed-upstream and l10n.
>
> The page pkgreport-opts.inc (used to build the BTS search page) is
> missing the following tags: ipv6 and lfs (though URLs with tag=lfs
> seem to work, i.e.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=no&pkg=yencode&tag=lfs).
>
> Anybody mind if I commit the following 2 patches (one for Bugs/*.wml,
> one for po/bugs.pot)?
Please do (though you'll probably have to regenerate them, since
they'll conflict with the changes I just made).
--
Matt Kraai kraai@ftbfs.org http://ftbfs.org/
Reply to: