Re: Proposal: Document reasons for unpackeable software
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:17:34PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > > So, all for it, but we need someone who offers to do the work (as
> > > > always).
> > >
> > > Why is it me so often...
> > I hereby change my opinion and offer to help you. Just getting
> > out-of-context information of not-yet-finished discussion in the
> > weekly DWN is getting on my nerves, so I will have to subscribe
> > anyway :(
> Err... some parse errors... But I read help... we should go on
> with mplayer and squeak...
Hmm, mplayer seems a bit heavy for the start ;) Will try to write
something useful about the squeak license.
Frank Lichtenheld <firstname.lastname@example.org>