Typos in web sites
Hi all,
during proofreading of German files I found a few typos in english/. I
fixed already a few wrong names such as "Michelmayr" instead of
"Michlmayr" nevertheless there are a few more.
Jens
Index: News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -u -r1.3 index.wml
--- News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml 29 Apr 2002 07:02:00 -0000 1.3
+++ News/weekly/2001/6/index.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:07 -0000
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
Collins</a> and
<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote-0102/msg00018.html";>Branden
Robinson</a> have posted platforms so far. Ben listed some specific issues
-he wants to deal with if if elected, including "<i>allowing new maintainers
+he wants to deal with if elected, including "<i>allowing new maintainers
with less privileges</i>", QA, and a more pro-active stance on security.
Branden, in turn, listed some issues including a more formalized delegation
process, keeping track of unmaintained packages and MIA developers, and
Index: ports/alpha/sys_types.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/ports/alpha/sys_types.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -u -r1.10 sys_types.wml
--- ports/alpha/sys_types.wml 6 Mar 2004 01:25:08 -0000 1.10
+++ ports/alpha/sys_types.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
</tr>
<tr>
-<td>AlphaSever 800 5/333...500</td>
+<td>AlphaServer 800 5/333...500</td>
<td>Corelle <i>(Noritake family)</i></td>
<td>Yes</td>
Index: security/faq.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/faq.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -u -r1.36 faq.wml
--- security/faq.wml 27 Feb 2004 23:56:19 -0000 1.36
+++ security/faq.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
<toc-add-entry name=missing>I've seen DSA 100 and DSA 102, now where is DSA 101?</toc-add-entry>
<p>A: Several vendors (mostly of GNU/Linux, but also of BSD
- deriviates) coordinate security advisories for some incidents and
+ derivates) coordinate security advisories for some incidents and
agree to a particular timeline so that all vendors are able to
release an advisory at the same time. This was decided in order to
not discriminate some vendors that need more time (e.g. when the
Index: security/index.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/index.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.69
diff -u -u -r1.69 index.wml
--- security/index.wml 3 Mar 2004 19:16:32 -0000 1.69
+++ security/index.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:08 -0000
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
the <a href="#DSAS">Debian Security Advisories</a> are
<a href="cve-compatibility">CVE-Compatible</a> and Debian is represented
in the Board of the
-<a href="http://oval.mitre.org/";>Open Vulnerability Assesment Language</a> project.
+<a href="http://oval.mitre.org/";>Open Vulnerability Assessment Language</a> project.
</P>
<H2>Keeping your Debian system secure</H2>
Index: security/2003/dsa-324.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/security/2003/dsa-324.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -u -r1.5 dsa-324.wml
--- security/2003/dsa-324.wml 21 Jul 2003 15:48:18 -0000 1.5
+++ security/2003/dsa-324.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:09 -0000
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
<li> The SPNEGO dissector could segfault while parsing an invalid
ASN.1 value.
<li> The RMI dissector handled strings improperly
+ as these modules are not present.</p>
</ul>
-<p>as these modules are not present.</p>
<p>For the stable distribution (woody) these problems have been fixed in
version 0.9.4-1woody5.</p>
Index: vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -u -r1.5 transcript.wml
--- vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 18 Jan 2003 13:21:53 -0000 1.5
+++ vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml 9 Mar 2004 14:13:09 -0000
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
Generally, better communication should prevent this sort of thing though - and I think that's very important.
<p><b>Ben:</b>
- I think I differ in my assesment of the "new maintainer fallout" in that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure...
+ I think I differ in my assessment of the "new maintainer fallout" in that I think it deals more generally with some core issues in our structure...
<br><b>Ben:</b>
after talking to a couple of people involved with new maintainer I was shown that they were basically asking for help quite a while before they decided to close
asking for help indirectly, but still, they asked
Reply to: