[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235459: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_contents doesn't do what it should)



Your message dated Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:30:25 +0100
with message-id <20040307003025.GM718@djpig.de>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 15:16:43 +0000
>From m.w.j.romans@phys.uu.nl Sun Feb 29 07:16:43 2004
Return-path: <m.w.j.romans@phys.uu.nl>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AxSgN-0001bc-00; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 07:16:43 -0800
Received: from 242pc234.sshunet.nl ([127.0.0.1]) [131.211.234.242] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AxSgM-0001tI-00; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:16:42 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mathijs Romans <m.w.j.romans@phys.uu.nl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: "Search the contents of packages" fails for whole filename
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:16:59 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: m.w.j.romans@phys.uu.nl
Message-Id: <E1AxSgM-0001tI-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

When I search for the file 'fancyheadings.sty', which is in tex/tetex-extra, in the "Search the contents of packages" section on the webpage, no files are 
found. Curiously, if I search for 'fancyheadings.st', it does give the right package.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 235459-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2004 00:30:29 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Sat Mar 06 16:30:29 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AzmBZ-0004Qs-00; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 16:30:29 -0800
Received: from p50839f7c.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.159.124] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1AzmBY-0008KO-00
	for <235459-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:30:28 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AzmBV-0003si-00
	for <235459-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:30:25 +0100
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 01:30:25 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 235459-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <20040307003025.GM718@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 235459-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level: 

The search_contents script should work properly now.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: