[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#223471: marked as done (www.debian.org: References to 3.0r1 need to be updated)



Your message dated Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
with message-id <20040109115830.GH702@djpig.de>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2003 17:20:53 +0000
>From dom@home.thedom.org Tue Dec 09 11:20:52 2003
Return-path: <dom@home.thedom.org>
Received: from urchin.earth.li [193.201.200.73] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1ATkrr-0004Hz-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:37:47 -0600
Received: from gw-bgdn.cipe ([10.1.1.1] helo=gw)
	by urchin.earth.li with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ATkrq-0004ZM-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:46 +0000
Received: from callisto.house
	([10.1.1.12] helo=callisto ident=mail)
	by gw with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ATkrq-0005Nq-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:46 +0000
Received: from dom by callisto with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ATkrp-0006Ak-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:45 +0000
From: dom@earth.li
Subject: www.debian.org: References to 3.0r1 need to be updated
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <E1ATkrp-0006Ak-00@callisto>
Sender: Dominic Hargreaves <dom@home.thedom.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:37:45 +0000
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME 
	autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20031209
Severity: normal

Several places on the web site incorrectly reference 3.0r1 as being the
current release, eg:

http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/#which
http://www.debian.org/

the former could be fixed by changing the links
..../jigdo-area/3.0_r1/jigdo/ to ....//jigdo-area/3.0_r2/jigdo, or wait for
the bug #223437 to be fixed and use the "current" link instead.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 223471-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2004 15:46:49 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Fri Jan 09 09:46:24 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AevHv-0006fw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:58:51 -0600
Received: from pd9530854.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.84] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1AevHt-0000sp-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:50 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AevHc-0000lw-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:58:32 +0100
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:58:30 +0100
To: 222258-done@bugs.debian.org, 223471-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <20040109115830.GH702@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 223471-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Oh, I forgot to close these bug reports. All references to 3.0r1
should have been updated.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: