On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 22:19, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:11:30PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-25 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > It's a great resource, I think it should be linked to. > > Is there any reason not to just do that? > > Index: testing.wml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/testing.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.17 > diff -p -u -r1.17 testing.wml > --- testing.wml 18 Sep 2003 16:07:07 -0000 1.17 > +++ testing.wml 9 Nov 2003 03:15:20 -0000 > @@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ that are out of date for > <a href="http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/stable_outdate.txt";>stable</a> and > <a href="http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/unstable_outdate.txt";>unstable</a>.</p> > > +<p>Björn Stenberg has written a > +<a href="http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/";>frontend</a> to help you find out why > +packages are being held out of testing.</p> > + > <p>You might be interested in reading an older > <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0008/msg00906.html";>explanation > email</a>. Its only major flaw is that it doesn't take the package pool Front end is two words, but otherwise, I don't see why this should not be added.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part