[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#195105: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_packages: search is (temporarily) broken)



Your message dated Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:15:34 +0200
with message-id <20030912151534.GG569@djpigpb>
and subject line Will close it because unreproducible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2003 19:01:15 +0000
>From jdaily@progeny.com Wed May 28 14:01:14 2003
Return-path: <jdaily@progeny.com>
Received: from morimoto.progeny.com [216.37.46.163] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19L6Ak-0004Pl-00; Wed, 28 May 2003 14:01:14 -0500
Received: from albus.progeny.com (albus.progeny.com [192.168.1.14])
	by morimoto.progeny.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C7CC4636A6; Wed, 28 May 2003 14:01:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: by albus.progeny.com (Postfix, from userid 10018)
	id 88D4D18145; Wed, 28 May 2003 14:01:10 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "John R. Daily" <jdaily@progeny.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: packages.d.o: Search is broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:01:10 -0500
Message-Id: <20030528190110.88D4D18145@albus.progeny.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-28
Severity: important

When running searches on packages names, or using the URL shortcut
http://packages.debian.org/foo, I'm currently seeing:

    Malformed query! (Or something strange happened to this script.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux albus.progeny.com 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195105-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2003 15:12:09 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Fri Sep 12 10:07:00 2003
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19xpVg-00088N-00; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:06:56 -0500
Received: from fphfslinux.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de ([129.13.104.109] helo=djpigpb)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35)
	id 19xpVf-0003Nt-00
	for <195105-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:06:55 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpigpb with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19xpe2-0000sp-00
	for <195105-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:15:34 +0200
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:15:34 +0200
To: 195105-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Will close it because unreproducible
Message-ID: <20030912151534.GG569@djpigpb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 195105-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
	tests=none
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Hi.

I close this bug as it seems to have happend only once and is completly
unreproducible now.

If you disagree or have encountered similar problems since then, please
object. Will reopen it then.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: