Re: Package search improvements
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much
> > cheaper.
>
> Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that
> was briefly mentioned on -www recently -- the MaxClients 300 setting
> on gluck exceeds the maxproc 256 setting. Of course, this is a bug,
> and it will be fixed, but this still means that apache on the machine
> often runs two hundred processes as it is, so adding more CGIs/PHPs
> wouldn't exactly be the happiest solution.
Sane performance tuning strategies dictate that more stuff should be
in-process, then. Is mod_perl feasible?
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: