Bug#133800: marked as done (Sorting of security items hides "new" old bugs)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:13:17 +0100
with message-id <20030328221317.GA804@djpig.de>
and subject line Will be fixed ;)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2002 17:01:59 +0000
>From kreutzm@physik.uni-hannover.de Wed Feb 13 11:01:59 2002
Return-path: <kreutzm@physik.uni-hannover.de>
Received: from mgate2.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.5] (zzismail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16b2n9-0003TI-00; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:01:59 -0600
Received: from mgate6.rrzn.uni-hannover.de by mgate2.uni-hannover.de
with LocalSMTP (PP) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:01:25 +0100
Received: from pallas.amp.uni-hannover.de by mgate6.rrzn.uni-hannover.de
with LocalSMTP (PP) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:59:54 +0100
Received: from cip01.amp.uni-hannover.de (cip01.amp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.75.1])
by pallas.amp.uni-hannover.de (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with ESMTP
id RAA29912; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:59:53 +0100 (MET)
Received: from kreutzm by cip01.amp.uni-hannover.de
with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16b2l6-0006jT-00;
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:59:52 +0100
From: Helge Kreutzmann <kreutzm@physik.uni-hannover.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Sorting of security items hides "new" old bugs
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54.1
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:59:52 +0100
Message-Id: <E16b2l6-0006jT-00@cip01.amp.uni-hannover.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-13
Severity: important
Security updates which are really a re-issued old update (with new/proper
fix) are not shown as new bug, thus may be overlooked.
Example:
[SECURITY] [DSA 079-2] was issued on Feb. 11 but is not shown on
http://www.debian.org/security
directly, but rather in the 2001-section where probably few people would
look for a new/reissued security update.
Note that in this example immediate upgrade was recommended.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cip01 2.2.20 #1 Sat Dec 1 22:39:28 CET 2001 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 133800-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2003 22:13:29 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Fri Mar 28 16:13:28 2003
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18z26K-0001hQ-00; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:13:28 -0600
Received: from pd9e39da2.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.157.162] helo=djpig.hell)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18z26I-0004PI-00
for <133800-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:13:26 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18z269-0006KB-00
for <133800-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:13:17 +0100
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:13:17 +0100
To: 133800-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Will be fixed ;)
Message-ID: <20030328221317.GA804@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 133800-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
I haved changed the calls to get_recent_list on / and security/
to use the new "bydate" format. Therefor future revisions of
DSAs will be shown correctly on this two pages when they are
correctly updated (see the new README in CVS).
I will close this bug because I believe it's fixed with this
changes (and I see no reason to update all old DSAs).
Greetings,
Frank Lichtenheld
--
*** Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> ***
*** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
- http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
Reply to: