* Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> [2003-01-14 11:18]:
> Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> It includes two ways to see if there is a report for that event:
>> -) First is to grep through the event page and look for a
>> <a href="$(WML_SRC_BASENAME)-report"> link, extract the URL from
>> there.
>
> I'd rather scan the directory for a foo-report.wml file which will be
> the report for foo.wml.
As said that is rather tricky for the foo.wml should depend on
foo-report.wml to be rebuilt but that would lead on the other hand to a
'no rule or target to build foo-report.wml' or such. I personally don't
know how to tackle that in a sensible way.
> I'd also like such a link to be added automatically to the events page
> when it is a past_event and there is such a file (or it exists in the
> english dir).
If it's possible somehow of course. But I don't have an idea how to do
it.
> I'd rather call it <report> instead of <rep> or did I miss something
> and new tags must not be descriptive?
I did call it <rep> for I had the gettext tag called <report> but that
one is dropped now so there is nothing wrong with calling it <report>.
> If you insist on the <rep> tag (or something similar, why not define
> it in the header as
>
> <define-tag report>http://lists.debian.org/debian-events-eu-0210/msg00019.html</define-tag>
How to you use it, then? I thought of that, too but found no easy way
to include it in the list at the end, then.
>> +<define-tag rep endtag=required whitespace=delete>
>> +<preserve href />
>> +<set-var %attributes />
>> + <a href="<get-var href />">%body</a>
>> + <restore href />
>> +</define-tag>
>
> Nitpick, but why do you indent <restore> different to <preserve>?
Just because I can. That means for no special reason.
So long,
Alfie
--
Wo wir schon bei Schnäppchenbestrafungen sind: ich finde § 307 StGB hat ein
recht ordentliches Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis. Soviel Bums für sowenig Strafe
gibt sonst nirgendwo.
-- Holger Lembke in de.soc.recht.misc
Attachment:
pgp6hhn8bXuWf.pgp
Description: PGP signature