Re: APT Documentation
- To: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>, Joris Lambrecht <joris.lambrecht@pandora.be>, debian-www@lists.debian.org, bortz@debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org, apt-rpm@distro.conectiva.com.br
- Subject: Re: APT Documentation
- From: Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:17:38 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20021126211737.GB17332@madhack.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>, Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>, Joris Lambrecht <joris.lambrecht@pandora.be>, debian-www@lists.debian.org, bortz@debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org, apt-rpm@distro.conectiva.com.br
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021126200714.GD6372@sven.home.hoaxter.de>
- References: <[🔎] 1038234572.1804.2.camel@nodelander> <[🔎] 20021125145040.GB20574@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 20021126041313.GA1532@madhack.com> <[🔎] 20021126200714.GD6372@sven.home.hoaxter.de>
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:07:14PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> I think that this is also interessting for people using apt-rpm. I have
> a small collection of apt-rpm sources for RH here:
> http://cs1.telelev.net/rh73-public.sources.list
> http://cs1.telelev.net/rh80-public.sources.list
>
> If you're willing to include apt sources for other package systems and
> distribution the site would be a realy nice place for all :)
FWIW, I'm not checking what it's for, I'm just checking the validity
by actually trying to "apt-get update" with the specified sources, and
manually filtering out things that are obviously junk (like if someone
clever were to put "deb http://your.mother" as an apt source or something).
--
Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>
GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7 0DC0 EF31 DF83 7313 FE2B 77A8 F36A 3B04 7084
In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six
feet downward and covered with dirt.
- Blair P. Houghton
Reply to: