[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#169843: marked as done (Misspelling under "Severity levels")



Your message dated Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:34:09 +0100
with message-id <2002-11-20_11.34.04@alfie.ist.org>
and subject line Bug#169843: Misspelling under "Severity levels"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2002 02:48:48 +0000
>From netsnipe@debianplanet.org Tue Nov 19 20:48:47 2002
Return-path: <netsnipe@debianplanet.org>
Received: from mail017.syd.optusnet.com.au [210.49.20.175] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18EKv1-0002SZ-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:48:47 -0600
Received: from espresso (c17074.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.28.79.187])
	by mail017.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id gAK2mjC09740
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:48:45 +1100
Received: from netsnipe by espresso with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18EKuy-00087o-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:48:44 +1100
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:48:44 +1100
From: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@debianplanet.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Misspelling under "Severity levels"
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20021120024844.GA31203@espresso>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.9
Sender: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@debianplanet.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0
	tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-20
Severity: minor

<http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities>

grave
    makes the package in question unuseable or mostly so, or causes
data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the
accounts of users who use the package.

should read:
    makes the package in question UNUSABLE or mostly so, or causes

Thanks,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux espresso 2.4.19 #1 Tue Nov 12 23:32:34 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC


--=20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Andrew 'Netsnipe' Lau                   Computer Science & Sturep, UNSW *
*   "apt-get into it"                        Debian GNU/Linux Packager    *
*     <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0>      <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>     *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE92vgMmyTAfS6LaL0RAp1cAJ4/vtFj23Hu3DIqhFLu7rYl92VQ5QCdGtd8
WoT/qKFB5URyVXhBw1LXt44=
=tGG6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169843-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2002 10:35:30 +0000
>From alfie@ist.org Wed Nov 20 04:35:29 2002
Return-path: <alfie@ist.org>
Received: from mail.wootsoft.com [213.225.54.26] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18ESCf-0004xU-00; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 04:35:29 -0600
Received: from fwe.wootsoft.com ([213.225.54.27] helo=asgard.pte.at)
	by mail.wootsoft.com with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ESDu-0004Fd-00; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:36:46 +0100
Received: from alfie by asgard.pte.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18ESBN-0002DV-00; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:34:09 +0100
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:34:09 +0100
From: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org>
To: Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au>, 169843-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#169843: Misspelling under "Severity levels"
Message-ID: <2002-11-20_11.34.04@alfie.ist.org>
References: <[🔎] 20021120024844.GA31203@espresso> <[🔎] 20021120113852.L5221@neep.com.au> <[🔎] 2002-11-20_09.49.39@alfie.ist.org> <[🔎] 20021120174418.T5221@neep.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20021120174418.T5221@neep.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.2 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s !:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,\IfUUY*hqPGSo%8WnAh7_6P@Clt8^Vy` {3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org>
X-Scanner: exiscan *18ESDu-0004Fd-00*qEfoitZePO2* (Wootsoft Entertainment)
Delivered-To: 169843-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.2 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> [2002-11-20 17:44]:
> Gerfried Fuchs said:
>>  But the seconds version shouldn't be used, Andrew (Lau ;) is right. It
>> is the first time that I see it documented anywhere, I am not sure if
>> WordNet is correct in that respect...
>=20
> Okay.  Maybe a bug should be filed against the dict-wn package.  ;)

 That would make sense, yes.

 Fixed the file now, it should be appear after the next rebuild of the
pages (btw., just a few lines below there was it with the other
writing... consitency is another reason for that change :).

 So long,
Alfie
--=20
It is generally useful for programs to be able to query which languages the
user can understand.  And most users (except for the French and USA'ans) _c=
an_
understand more than one language.
              -- Jacob Sparre Andersen in http://bugs.kde.org/db/19/19831.h=
tml

--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE922UhMU96lewVKUIRAkDVAJ4/r/VHdmj8MP0Pr7aCSvUZwOXe+gCgmeDj
oGe4WRzQFWmYO6OQcXHgVm8=
=saih
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--huq684BweRXVnRxX--



Reply to: