Bug#138147: marked as done (www.debian.org: DWN current page on www.nl.debian.org is behind)
Your message dated Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:06:07 +0200
with message-id <20020407130607.GA18404@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#138147: www.debian.org: DWN current page on www.nl.debian.org is behind
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2002 13:33:46 +0000
>From zweije@martinpc.cs.kun.nl Wed Mar 13 07:33:46 2002
Return-path: <zweije@martinpc.cs.kun.nl>
Received: from martinpc.cs.kun.nl (martinpc) [131.174.33.237] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16l8sz-0000UR-00; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 07:33:46 -0600
Received: by martinpc (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 10C23472C; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:33:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Vincent Zweije <zweije@martinpc.cs.kun.nl>
Subject: www.debian.org: DWN current page on www.nl.debian.org is behind
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <20020313133343.10C23472C@martinpc>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:33:43 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20020313
Severity: normal
http://www.nl.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/ still
refers to the Debian Weekly News of 27 February, whereas
http://www.nl.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/ already referes to
the DWN of 6 March.
Possibly releveant:
Preferred languages: nl,en,de,fr in that order.
Browsers: opera, netscape, lynx
Ciao. Vincent.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux martinpc 2.4.18 #2 Wed Mar 6 16:50:49 CET 2002 i686 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 138147-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2002 13:01:55 +0000
>From joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr Sun Apr 07 08:01:55 2002
Return-path: <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16uCIt-0008C5-00; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 08:01:55 -0500
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16uCMx-0004oG-00; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 15:06:07 +0200
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:06:07 +0200
To: Vincent Zweije <zweije@cs.kun.nl>
Cc: 138147-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#138147: www.debian.org: DWN current page on www.nl.debian.org is behind
Message-ID: <20020407130607.GA18404@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <20020313133343.10C23472C@martinpc> <20020313203552.GH6411@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <20020314093902.GA15394@hera.cs.kun.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020314093902.GA15394@hera.cs.kun.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Delivered-To: 138147-done@bugs.debian.org
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:39:02AM +0100, Vincent Zweije wrote:
> || > http://www.nl.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/ still
> || > refers to the Debian Weekly News of 27 February, whereas
> || > http://www.nl.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/ already referes to
> || > the DWN of 6 March.
> ||
> || Umm, is it just me or did you paste two exactly the same URLs over there?
>
> They look the same to me too :-(. I meant the second to be
>
> http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/current/issue/
>
> i.e. on the main webserver.
Ah, I see. Well, it's fixed now.
It most likely happened because the NL server isn't updating the optimal
way, but I tried to have it fixed once before, and I'm tired of fighting
windmills.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: