Re: Testing URLcheck
James A. Treacy wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 03:21:28PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Something strange I noticed while reading urlcheck's output:
> >
> > | Looking into http://www.debian.org/events/2001/0504-linuxtag-braunschweig
> > | http://braunschweiger.linuxtage.de/ : IOError: gave up on site (15 second limit)
> > | http://braunschweiger.linuxtage.de/ : IOError: gave up on site (15 second limit)
> > | http://braunschweiger.linuxtage.de/ : IOError: gave up on site (15 second limit)
> >
> > What's that? Some connection limit? If so could urlcheck be advised
> > to check such an address later? Additionally, could urlcheck cache
> > pages?
> >
> The default timeout is quite long (2min?) and causes the script to take an incredibly
Doh!
> long time to run so I used a signal to shorten it. The message shows the time before
> timing out, so if the site actually works you can ignore the message.
Yes, it works. There are just a lot of such reports produced by
urlcheck and it takes quite a while checking all of them.
>
> > | Looking into http://www.debian.org/events/2001/0704-debcon
> > | http://www.debian.org/events/2001/0704-debcon.fr.html : Error = (404) Not Found
> >
> > That's quite strange, some apache problem?
> >
> > | Looking into http://www.debian.org/events/2001/
> > | http://www.debian.org/events/2001/index.fr.html : Error = (404) Not Found
> >
> > Problem on www.debian.org.
> >
> I suspect both of these will not show up on the next run. When will that be?
> Soon, I hope (have to make a few changes before the next run).
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is too short to run proprietary software. -- Bdale Garbee
Reply to: