Re: mirror/submit.wml

[Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>]

peter karlsson wrote:
> Martin Schulze:
> 
> > Our definition of tablerow looks weired and assumes that browser
> > actually ignore non-closing tags.
> 
> Having the ending tag for TD and TR is strictly optional in HTML.

Really?  I always thought that HTML was strict about those tags,
especially since Netscape tends to stop working or behave strangely
when some of them are missing.

However, even if they're optional, we're trying to provide "good" HTML,
or not?

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.