[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: For Joy



Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 08:10:51PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Is this somewhere on our web pages now?
> 
> It isn't. I guess it can be on the TODO list ;)
> 
> > > > > When "the Debian Project" sits on boards like this, who represents it?
>                                                       ~~~~
> like what, exactly?

Was it the Gnome thing?  Was it the Corel thing?

> > > > > The DPL?

He knows it.  However since many water flew down the rivers, you'd
better ask the former DPL not the current one.

> > > > 
> > > > In this case it happens to be me, but it might be other people as well
> > > > (for example Christoph Lameter represents Debian on the LPI advisory
> > > > councel and at LI).
> > > > 
> > > > > Are individual developers welcome to ask the delegate to the
> > > > > board to put forward an opinion on their behalf, and through what
> > > > > channels should this go?
> > > > 
> > > > Of course! Just mail them.
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe we should make a list of where we have delegates.. the ones
> > > > I can think of right now are:
> > > > * LPI advisory councel
> > > > * Linux International
> 
> > > > * Corel Linux advisory council
> 
> Data missing.
> 
> > > > * LSB conference calls
> 
> Data missing.

ask dwarf, I assume.

> 
> > > > * Linux Magazine advisory council
> 
> Data missing.

ask Joey, I presume.  (NOT me, the other one)

> > > > * GNOME foundation advisory council
> 
> Guess what. :)

Ask wiggy, the mail is from him, he's on some of the boards,
if he doesn't know more, nobody does.

> Who would get the data for such a list? Who would maintain it?

the guy who wants the data should get it, no?

Maintain?  Dunno, I only hope this is visible on our web pages.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
GNU does not eliminate all the world's problems, only some of them.
                                                -- The GNU Manifesto

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.



Reply to: