Re: html 4.0 validation for the site.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 09:24:35AM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> I ran the html validator at w3.org on some of the web pages.
> Here are the results:
Should we be really using 4.0? I thought it had some serious problem
with it and 4.01 was the way to go. Certainly I had a problem with wml
before (thinking it was doing the wrong thing) and the wml folks said
it was because i was testing against 4.0 instead of 4.01
But yes, we should make out pages compliant.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: