[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#76872: marked as done (dead link when searching for 'orphaned')



Your message dated Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:31:08 +1100
with message-id <20001113083108.A5045@eye-net.com.au>
and subject line Bug#76872: dead link when searching for 'orphaned'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2000 18:20:01 +0000
>From cybrdemo@brfree.com.br Sun Nov 12 12:20:01 2000
Return-path: <cybrdemo@brfree.com.br>
Received: from dl-vdl-rio-c8d63977.tl1.terra.com.br (hostname) [::ffff:200.214.57.119] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 13v1jU-0005zt-00; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 12:20:01 -0600
Received: from cybrdemo by hostname with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 13v1lO-0000EC-00; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 16:21:58 -0200
From: Carlos Laviola <claviola@brfree.com.br>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: dead link when searching for 'orphaned'
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.3
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.3
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 16:21:57 -0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E13v1lO-0000EC-00@hostname>
Sender: cyberdemo <cybrdemo@brfree.com.br>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2000-11-12
Severity: normal

When using the search engine at (http://search.debian.org/) to look for
the word "orphaned"
(http://search.debian.org/index?ps=10&q=orphaned&ps=20&o=0&m=and&ul=&lang=), 
the first result (http://www.debian.org/devel/orphaned.html) no longer
exists.

-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux clitoris 2.4.0-test10 #1 Sáb Nov 11 17:53:20 BRST 2000 i586


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 76872-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2000 21:31:20 +0000
>From csmall@eye-net.com.au Sun Nov 12 15:31:19 2000
Return-path: <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
Received: from gonzo.eye-net.com.au [::ffff:203.41.228.17] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 13v4iZ-00047i-00; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 15:31:17 -0600
Received: by gonzo.eye-net.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C7A48C5DA; Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:31:08 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 08:31:08 +1100
To: Carlos Laviola <claviola@brfree.com.br>,
	76872-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#76872: dead link when searching for 'orphaned'
Message-ID: <20001113083108.A5045@eye-net.com.au>
References: <[🔎] E13v1lO-0000EC-00@hostname>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E13v1lO-0000EC-00@hostname>; from claviola@brfree.com.br on Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 04:21:57PM -0200
From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
Delivered-To: 76872-done@bugs.debian.org

On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 04:21:57PM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> When using the search engine at (http://search.debian.org/) to look for
> the word "orphaned"
> (http://search.debian.org/index?ps=10&q=orphaned&ps=20&o=0&m=and&ul=&lang=), 
> the first result (http://www.debian.org/devel/orphaned.html) no longer
> exists.

The indexer will always be algged a bit, but I had a closer look into
these specific URLs for that page.  It seems I did not turn on the
"delete the URL if it goes" flag for the indexer.

I've now corrected that oversight and manually deleted missing
documents.  Your answers should be more sensible now.

  - Craig
-- 
Craig Small VK2XLZ  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/        <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org>                 Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>



Reply to: