Bug#75919: marked as done (bad background on valid html image)
Your message dated Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:15:52 +0100
with message-id <20001030201552.A7947@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#75919: bad background on valid html image
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2000 18:48:48 +0000
>From kraai@opensource.lineo.com Mon Oct 30 12:48:48 2000
Return-path: <kraai@opensource.lineo.com>
Received: from opensource.lineo.com [::ffff:207.179.39.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13qJzD-0003VK-00; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:48:47 -0600
Received: by opensource.lineo.com (Postfix, from userid 1011)
id 670B919338A; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:48:46 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 11:48:46 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.carnegiemellon.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bad background on valid html image
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20001030114846.A702@opensource.lineo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Sender: kraai@opensource.lineo.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
http://www.debian.org/ contains a Valid HTML 4.01 image. This image
does not have a transparent background, and so the tail of the checkmark
looks poor. There is a gif available from the w3c which does have a
transparent background. They also have a PNG image, but for some reason
it doesn't have a transparent background. The appended patch changes
this page to use the GIF.
Matt
Index: english/template/debian/menubar.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/template/debian/menubar.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -r1.153 menubar.wml
--- english/template/debian/menubar.wml 2000/10/27 22:28:52 1.153
+++ english/template/debian/menubar.wml 2000/10/30 18:47:21
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@
<P>
<A href="$(HOME)/sponsor.html"><IMG src="sponsor_img.jpg" border="0" vspace="16" alt="<visitsponsor>"></A><BR>
- <A href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer";><IMG src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401"; border=0 alt="Valid HTML 4.01!" width=88 height=31></A>
+ <A href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer";><IMG src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401.gif"; border=0 alt="Valid HTML 4.01!" width=88 height=31></A>
</P>
</TD>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 75919-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2000 19:11:09 +0000
>From joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr Mon Oct 30 13:11:09 2000
Return-path: <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [::ffff:161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13qKKo-0005dQ-00; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:11:07 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13qKPQ-00026J-00; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:15:52 +0100
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:15:52 +0100
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
To: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.carnegiemellon.edu>,
75919-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#75919: bad background on valid html image
Message-ID: <20001030201552.A7947@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <[🔎] 20001030114846.A702@opensource.lineo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20001030114846.A702@opensource.lineo.com>; from kraai@alumni.carnegiemellon.edu on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 11:48:46AM -0700
Delivered-To: 75919-close@bugs.debian.org
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 11:48:46AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> http://www.debian.org/ contains a Valid HTML 4.01 image. This image
> does not have a transparent background, and so the tail of the checkmark
> looks poor. There is a gif available from the w3c which does have a
> transparent background. They also have a PNG image, but for some reason
> it doesn't have a transparent background. The appended patch changes
> this page to use the GIF.
Are you sure it's not just your browser that doesn't support transparent
PNGs? I know my Netscape doesn't...
Aside from the fact that I would rather see those fifteen white pixels than
to switch back to GIF :>
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: