[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#74931: [MAILER-DAEMON@egr.msu.edu: Returned mail: User has moved; please try <network@egr.msu.edu>]



It seems that the e-mail address for ftp.us.d.o maintainer needs to be
corrected. I'll try the address suggested below, and if it works, fix it in
Mirrors.masterlist file.

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@egr.msu.edu> -----

Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:55:56 +0200
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:35:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@egr.msu.edu>
To: <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Subject: Returned mail: User has moved; please try <network@egr.msu.edu>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)

The original message was received at Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:35:14 -0400 (EDT)
from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
network@egr.msu.edu.REDIRECT
    (expanded from: <sn_net@egr.msu.edu>)

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
551 User has moved; please try <network@egr.msu.edu>

Reporting-MTA: dns; egr.msu.edu
Received-From-MTA: DNS; cibalia.gkvk.hr
Arrival-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:35:14 -0400 (EDT)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; <sn_net@egr.msu.edu>
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:35:20 -0400 (EDT)

Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 16:38:55 +0200
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
To: mirrors@debian.org, sn_net@egr.msu.edu
Cc: 74931@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#74931: http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist has various broken links
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i

On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 10:25:05PM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ [doesn't] work at all.

Indeed, the server seems to be rejecting both FTP and HTTP connections.

Can someone please check into this, and fix it if any way possible?

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification



Reply to: