[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lists.debian.org not updating some lists



So it looks like every single one of these things is *fine* on master.
But IIRC master is no longer where the lists stuff is hosted. So
something is wrong here.

BTW, I can't see any way on earth that the 5coords script could be
working on va either, as it references files in directories that do not
exist.

Just massively confused and annyoed. It looks like shit with the website 
has managed to delay DWN AGAIN. 

Joey Hess wrote:
> joeyh@va:/org/www.debian.org/lists.debian.org>ls debian-user-0008
> ls: debian-user-0008: No such file or directory
> joeyh@va:/org/www.debian.org/lists.debian.org>ls debian-user-000* -d
> debian-user-0001/  debian-user-0003/  debian-user-0005/  debian-user-0007/
> debian-user-0002/  debian-user-0004/  debian-user-0006/
> 
> So no debian-user posts this month? Hmmm.
> 
> joeyh@va:/org/www.debian.org/lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-00>grep
> ^Date: ../../lists/debian-security-announce-00 |tail 
> Date:         Sun, 2 Jul 2000 06:37:40 -0700
> Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 02:40:24 -0400
> Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:41:16 -0700
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 04:41:52 +0200
> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 10:17:27 -0400
> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:03:26 +0200 (CEST)
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 14:23:16 +0200 (CEST)
> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 23:23:10 +0200 (CEST)
> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 13:13:13 +0530
> Date:         Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:29:06 -0700
> joeyh@va:/org/www.debian.org/lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-00>ls
> -l threads.html
> -rw-rw-r--   1 treacy   debwww       4261 Jul 31 11:22 threads.html
> 
> So it has not updated to the posts made on the 6th or 7th?
> 
> joeyh@va:/org/www.debian.org/lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0008>ls -l
> threads.html
> -rw-r--r--   1 treacy   debwww      54065 Aug  8 11:24 threads.html
> 
> And yet debian-devel is updating ok. What's going on?
> 
> Unfortunatly, I can't for the life of me find the cron job that runs
> mhonarc.
> 
> -- 
> see shy jo

-- 
see shy jo



Reply to: