Re: the modified BSD license is no more

[Taketoshi Sano <kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>]

Hi.

In article <[🔎] 20000530233906.A7323@cibalia.gkvk.hr>,
  at Tue, 30 May 2000 23:39:06 +0200,
 Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> writes:

> The `modified BSD license' doesn't exist anymore -- the modification has
> been included in the new version of the `ordinary' BSD license. If you're
> running potato, look at /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD file, notice how
> there's no `advertising clause'.

It's cool.

> Therefore, I have taken the liberty to update the web pages accordingly.
> Editing the translations was quite simple, I don't think anything went
> wrong, except perhaps for he Japanese translation, I really can't parse it
> well. Please check it out (intro/free.wml and intro/license_disc.wml) and
> correct any errors I may have done.

I check intro/license_disk.wml, and it has

<LI><A HREF="../misc/bsd.license">BSD style license</A>.
        <BR>
        <B>SUMMARY:</B> Binaries and source code must contain the license;
                advertising must acknowledge the developers listed in the license
        <BR>

Is this OK ? If the "BSD style license" does not have "advertising clause", 
should we remove the sentence above "advertising must acknowledge 
the developers listed in the license", then ?

I checked the Japanese translation also, there is no translation for
license_disk.wml. In free.wml, it seems to be enough just to remove
the List Item for modified BSD license. I will do it later for Japanese
translation of free.wml.

-- 
  Taketoshi Sano: <kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp>