Re: slink elm not Y2K?
Vincent Renardias said:
> it currently reads:
>
> elm-me+ >=2.4pl25ME+56-1 OK?
>
> while it should read
>
> elm-me+ >=2.4pl25ME+65-1 OK?
>
Why? I couldn't find any Y2K fixes in the changelog between these
versions. Have I missed something?
>
> I just saw another problem; the table says:
>
> emacs20 20.2 OK?
>
> while there *is* a y2k bug in emacs20 20.3-10. (see #43249)
Hmm, you're right, even though the GNU web page says it is ok.
I will adjust the entry and put the URL as the bug report.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: