Re: slink elm not Y2K?
Vincent Renardias said:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Craig Small wrote:
> > I have made the following changes to the Y2K pages:
> > elm-me+ <=2.4pl25ME+52-1 BAD http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README
> > elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+56-1 OK? http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README
>
> 2.4pl25ME+65-1 OK? (65, not 56... ;)
I changed the last one to >= so it is "OK?"
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: