Re: slink elm not Y2K?
Vincent Renardias said:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
> > Also, elm should be added to the Debian Y2K page http://www.debian.org/y2k/
>
> Webmaster:
>
> Versions up to and including 2.4pl25ME+59 are known to have y2k
> problems.
> >From elm's changelog, 7 y2k pbms have been fixed between 2.4pl25ME+48 and
> 2.4pl25ME+66.
> I have no info on the y2k status (compliant or not) of the current
> release.
I have made the following changes to the Y2K pages:
elm-me+ <=2.4pl25ME+52-1 BAD http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README
elm-me+ 2.4pl25ME+56-1 OK? http://www.ozone.fmi.fi/KEH/elm-2.4ME+.README
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: