[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#361168: O: libapache-mod-lisp -- An Apache module that interfaces with Lisp environments



Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of libapache-mod-lisp, Matthew Danish <mrd@debian.org>,
is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I orphan this package now.

If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.

Some information about this package:

Package: libapache-mod-lisp
Binary: libapache-mod-lisp
Version: 2.41-0.1
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Maintainer: Matthew Danish <mrd@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 2.0.0), apache-dev
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-lisp
Files:
 04f88eac9787ad882aa7e0f1e9af6ea5 615 libapache-mod-lisp_2.41-0.1.dsc
 8b7a98871e3e28732b2ef16b8330a72d 12531 libapache-mod-lisp_2.41.orig.tar.gz
 3ed5b2aee00308decc565160fa40f03f 7389 libapache-mod-lisp_2.41-0.1.diff.gz

Package: libapache-mod-lisp
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 100
Maintainer: Matthew Danish <mrd@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.41-0.1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), apache-common (>> 1.3.29-1)
Filename: pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-lisp/libapache-mod-lisp_2.41-0.1_i386.deb
Size: 19176
MD5sum: 44c98f99e807d5af67f4bb857f127152
Description: An Apache module that interfaces with Lisp environments
 Establishes a link between the Apache web server and a Lisp environment
 that allows a Lisp program to generate dynamic content while letting
 Apache take care of the dirty details of HTTP serving.  The protocol
 between Lisp and Apache is simple, making it easy to create WWW-
 accessible applications quickly.
Tag: devel::library, langdevel::lisp, protocol::http, role::sw:server, suite::apache, web::scripting


Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: