[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#352431: marked as done (O: icheck -- Shared library ABI interface checker)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Apr 2006 15:17:11 -0700
with message-id <E1FQAsh-0006Wu-CB@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#352431: fixed in icheck 0.9.7-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I'm orphaning icheck. As far as I'm aware it doesn't have much of a
userbase since the original plans for its deployment in Debian never
happened, and I'm the upstream author, so it's probably dead now. Also
the chances of anybody else understanding the thing are pretty
slim. It should probably be removed.

The package description is:
 A tool for statically checking C interfaces for API and ABI
 changes. All changes to type declarations that can cause ABI changes
 should be detected, along with most API changes.
 .
 icheck is intended for use with libraries, as a method of preventing
 ABI drift.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: icheck
Source-Version: 0.9.7-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
icheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

icheck_0.9.7-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/icheck/icheck_0.9.7-6.diff.gz
icheck_0.9.7-6.dsc
  to pool/main/i/icheck/icheck_0.9.7-6.dsc
icheck_0.9.7-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/icheck/icheck_0.9.7-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 352431@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Erinn Clark <erinn@double-helix.org> (supplier of updated icheck package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 17:38:26 -0400
Source: icheck
Binary: icheck
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.7-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Erinn Clark <erinn@double-helix.org>
Changed-By: Erinn Clark <erinn@double-helix.org>
Description: 
 icheck     - C interface ABI/API checker
Closes: 352431
Changes: 
 icheck (0.9.7-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer upload. Closes: #352431.
Files: 
 22d514baa5757fd293e60865f1914d05 1216 devel optional icheck_0.9.7-6.dsc
 887a1a783ae510805df8ac7f3a088881 2866 devel optional icheck_0.9.7-6.diff.gz
 bdeac7a738734b9bcfa7c07fc9f24228 81390 devel optional icheck_0.9.7-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
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=/xTV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: