Bug#225690: marked as done (RFA: gnunet -- Secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:20:08 +1000
with message-id <20040912122008.3b60719a.bug1@iinet.net.au>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 17:38:52 +0000
>From bug1@iinet.net.au Wed Dec 31 11:38:50 2003
Return-path: <bug1@iinet.net.au>
Received: from mail-04.iinet.net.au (mail.iinet.net.au) [203.59.3.36]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AbipL-0000om-00; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:04:07 -0600
Received: (qmail 23013 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2003 16:04:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (203.173.28.217)
by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 31 Dec 2003 16:04:04 -0000
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 03:04:15 +1100
From: Glenn McGrath <bug1@iinet.net.au>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFA: gnunet -- Secure, trust-based peer-to-peer framework
Message-Id: <20040101030415.03e642a7.bug1@iinet.net.au>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg="pgp-sha1";
boundary="Signature=_Thu__1_Jan_2004_03_04_15_+1100_VvjkJ0sG9UKBuB9+"
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
--Signature=_Thu__1_Jan_2004_03_04_15_+1100_VvjkJ0sG9UKBuB9+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Due to time changing time commitments in the short to medium term, i
dont expect to do much work on gnunet on libextractor.
It could do with some attention, with a bit of work it could be compiled
against libgcrypt7 instead of its internal crypto which would be an
improvment.
Glenn
--Signature=_Thu__1_Jan_2004_03_04_15_+1100_VvjkJ0sG9UKBuB9+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/8vN/WWZyfXiLlL8RAmHsAJ0SKnOwPLrt2J6rCKOSxe7rSwL9LACcDhjW
3dSsXoZbLQibnR11HZM9Qfk=
=x3NZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Thu__1_Jan_2004_03_04_15_+1100_VvjkJ0sG9UKBuB9+--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225690-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2004 02:20:13 +0000
>From bug1@iinet.net.au Sat Sep 11 19:20:13 2004
Return-path: <bug1@iinet.net.au>
Received: from mail-01.iinet.net.au (mail.iinet.net.au) [203.59.3.33]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C6JyP-0001X3-00; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:20:13 -0700
Received: (qmail 462 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2004 02:20:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO home.me.org) (203.206.83.240)
by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 12 Sep 2004 02:20:08 -0000
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:20:08 +1000
From: Glenn McGrath <bug1@iinet.net.au>
To: 225690-done@bugs.debian.org
Message-Id: <20040912122008.3b60719a.bug1@iinet.net.au>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 225690-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This package ahs been adopted, as per my last email.
Reply to: