[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#181652: marked as done (ITP: konserve -- file/directory backup utility for KDE 3.x with systray and network support)



Your message dated Sun, 08 Aug 2004 01:27:22 -0400
with message-id <E1BtgDK-0001He-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#181652: fixed in konserve 0.10.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2003 17:51:37 +0000
>From dgrant@ieee.org Wed Feb 19 11:51:37 2003
Return-path: <dgrant@ieee.org>
Received: from cuic.ca [209.87.254.114] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18lYNc-0002Iy-00; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:51:36 -0600
Received: from debian ([134.22.74.20])
	by cuic.ca ([209.87.254.114])
	with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v6.5.1.R)
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:50:58 -0500
From: David Grant <dgrant@ieee.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: konserve -- file/directory backup utility for KDE 3.x with systray and network support
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:56:51 -0500
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Bcc: David Grant <dgrant@ieee.org>
Reply-To: David Grant <david.grant@telus.net>
X-MDRemoteIP: 134.22.74.20
X-Return-Path: dgrant@ieee.org
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Message-Id: <E18lYNc-0002Iy-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_DEBBUGS_CC
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-19
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : konserve
  Version         : 0.8
  Upstream Author : Florian Simnacher <florian.simnacher@eikon.tum.de>
* URL             : http://www.eikon.tum.de/~hermes/konserve.html
* License         : GPL
  Description     : file/directory backup utility for KDE 3.x with systray and network support

I intend to package this program.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181652-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 05:30:49 +0000
>From rdonald@newraff.debian.org Sat Aug 07 22:30:49 2004
Return-path: <rdonald@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BtgGf-0004fq-00; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 22:30:49 -0700
Received: from rdonald by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BtgDK-0001He-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 01:27:22 -0400
From: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <suy@badopi.org>
To: 181652-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#181652: fixed in konserve 0.10.3-1
Message-Id: <E1BtgDK-0001He-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 01:27:22 -0400
Delivered-To: 181652-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: konserve
Source-Version: 0.10.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
konserve, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

konserve_0.10.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/konserve/konserve_0.10.3-1.diff.gz
konserve_0.10.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/konserve/konserve_0.10.3-1.dsc
konserve_0.10.3-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/konserve/konserve_0.10.3-1_i386.deb
konserve_0.10.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/konserve/konserve_0.10.3.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 181652@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <suy@badopi.org> (supplier of updated konserve package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  9 Jun 2004 19:34:17 +0200
Source: konserve
Binary: konserve
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <suy@badopi.org>
Changed-By: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <suy@badopi.org>
Description: 
 konserve   - KDE kicker applet that performs periodic backups
Closes: 181652
Changes: 
 konserve (0.10.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #181652).
   * debian/rules:
     + Corrected minor issues from Guillem's comments.
     + Erased some lines containing only comments
     + Added -Wall -g to CFLAGS
   * debian/copyright: added excerpt of the GPL
   * debian/control: added automake and kdelibs4-dev to Build-Depends
Files: 
 c8e3b4720c08d571c75e6ea07a06a216 629 kde optional konserve_0.10.3-1.dsc
 5a3f38147e3b4ba371b59b01257a4e61 1246494 kde optional konserve_0.10.3.orig.tar.gz
 92cb694acdcf2415976065facfa5db49 25937 kde optional konserve_0.10.3-1.diff.gz
 3a2c7bc722882287f1018b78807e2739 502426 kde optional konserve_0.10.3-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBAbAjuW9ciZ2SjJsRAg3YAKDSrVbntO++YaUDO0IlOxZLuPQlcwCfceb4
CsgfrmZ8fMkrtZfr5E8+464=
=JPOK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: