Bug#235552: RFH: jaws -- just another weblog system
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:09:15PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net> [2004-08-02 20:02]:
> > > > Jaws is a very nice weblog, however my time has became more reduced, and
> > > > I have given priority to some other packages and Debian work, that's way
> > > > I would really like to request help for it.
> > >
> > > Hmm, should this be a RFH or a RFP?
> >
> > I would really like to ask for a help (that and also marking it with the
> > new RFH tag :), since I'm still interested on this.
> >
> > However, since it is not packaged yet, shoult this remain as ITP?
> > Probably no, that's way it is like a combination of ITP & RFH.
>
> I don't know what the best procedure is in this case, but I sort of
> would like to restrict to RFH to packages already in the archive. I'm
> CCing Frank so he can comment as well.
Yeah, I would prefer that, too. If you want, you can tag your ITP "help"
(and note it in your ITP that more people to work on it are welcome)
but the RFH tag is intended for packages that are already there and need
help, like a "weaker" version of RFA.
There is already a tag for new packages and it's ITP. Everyone interested
in the package will check the ITP anyway. But there wasn't a tag yet where
a maintainer could state his need of help without stating that he wants to
give package away, too.
(The original idea proposed by ajt was to redefine the RFA tag but
I think it is better this way)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: