[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#106735: ITP: mplayer - DivX/DVD/MPeg Player for Linux



Quoting Andrew Suffield (asuffield@users.sourceforge.net):
> > URL: http://mplayer.sourceforge.net
> I've been investigating the possibility of packaging mplayer for a
> while now, and it is positively riddled with complexities.

Yeah, I think I was too impulsive when ITP'ing mplayer, after reading
your extensive report (thanks!) on what you already figured out, I
kinda got scared to get chased by Black Helicopters and people in 
Black Suits... :)

> Licensing issues. The code is *NOT* released under the GPL. It is in
> an unknown state, being mostly GPL, but the opendivx code is not
> (license unspecified). In fact, it's been suggested it's not really
> opensource at all. This one will have to go to debian-legal at some
> point.

---] Website [---
License:
MPlayer incorporates a lot of code from other projects, but for now
everything except the OpenDivX stuff is GPL.
-----------------

My plan was to rip out OpenDivX support and package the rest so you
would get a MPEG player by default, but installing the proprietary
Win32 DLL's would get you DivX support too. 

DVD Decoding with libdecss is just too icky to bring in Debian, I
don't even want to go there, so if people want mplayer to play DVD's
they'd probably be best off apt-get source'ing mplayer and compiling
the pkg themselves with libdecss support...

> Possible patent issues, especially with .asf files and divx, and also
> MPEG itself. debian-legal will have to look at this one too. I haven't
> got around to looking into it yet.

Pff.. Man, what have I started :)

> Working on lib(de)css can theoretically get you arrested. That one
> will take *ages* to clear -legal, and may not be allowed at all.

I don't think Debian allows this pkg to be installed, but that was
not my intention either :)

> mplayer developers don't like binary packages, so don't expect a great
> deal of sympathy from them.

If it's true that mplayer actually needs to be recompiled on each
specific CPU type to get some speed in it, then I understand why they
don't want binary packages.

> Further note that there is no *way* the ftpmasters will install this
> without a statement from debian-legal.

*grin*

I think I read enough.. I will blow this off, I don't even have the time
to investigate all these license / patent things. Although it is
interresting...

Thanks again,

Sander.

-- 
| Leven is 't meervoud van lef
|     -- Loesje

Attachment: pgpUlrmRlcfnz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: