Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: Log for given-back build of asterisk_1:22.214.171.124~dfsg-3+lenny6 on arm (dist=lenny-security)]
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 12:03:25AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Thanks, and same for you!
>>>Can you look into the build failure below, the chroot
>>>seems hosed and IIRC you're the buildd admin.
>>>W: Conflicting distribution: http://security-master.debian.org lenny/ Release (expected lenny but got )
>>>W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
>> Maybe this is the problem. Both toffee and cats are showing the same
>> problem in recent logs AFAICS. Has the setup of the security archive
>> on s-m changed recently?
>Not recently. Beginning of December. Let me cite a mail from back then:
>From: Joerg Jaspert <email@example.com>
>Subject: security buildd changes
>Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:38:39 +0100
>we talked about it sometime more than a year ago, but now its final and
>needs to be done:
>buildd security lines for the security incoming MUST be
>deb http://security-master.debian.org/buildd-$suite /
>and not, as some of them have now
>deb http://security-master.debian.org/buildd/ $suite/
>(with suite one of lenny, squeeze or wheezy).
>Please adjust them to that.
>(This is the same way as on main (and bpo) archive, as our tool
>"manage-build-queues" simply does not provide a "Codename:" line, which
>is what the second line actually let apt expect. We only now switched
Great, that seems to have fixed toffee. Doing the same on cats now too.
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. firstname.lastname@example.org
Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing
lists asking us to send them to you.