On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:10:18AM +0100, Amaya wrote: > Thanks for having me in mind, but I want zack to win again :9 and the > mudslinging party at the nomination proccess puts me off, sorry. Thanks for pointing out the mudslinging part. I've always thought it's a completely unnecessary waste of energy that we could really do without. I don't think the DPL election needs more than people presenting their intended agenda and chances to commit to it, and questions asked to clarify details. The rebuttal part I find particularly funny, as it tends to be either "I mostly agree with what you say, although I see priorities differently" or "You're a nutter candidating as a joke but I have to waste half an hour in a strange ritual in which I find some formal diplomatic way to say it". The role of DPL has probably become more clearly defined over time: give talks and interviews, ping people, put people in touch with people. Because of that, I think the process of picking what active member of the project we will particularly listen to for the next year, could do with a lot less drama than we're used to. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature