Hi Wouter-- You probably didn't mean to have this to come out this way, but: On 03/23/2010 01:49 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Charles: > > In your platform, in the "Program" section, you mention four ideas that > could reasonable be described as being about the things that, > respectively, the DAM and NM frontdesk, the ftp-masters, and the Release > Managers (twice) are responsible for. Did you talk with these teams > about your ideas before running for DPL? This comes across as calling Charles out for not consulting other people (or at least not acknowledging their contributions). > Marga: [...] > Also, you seem to have received a great deal of help in writing your > platform. In the interest of clarity, can you shine a light on how this > happened? This comes across as calling Marga out for consulting too many other people (or at least for acknowledging their contributions too much). But you can't have it both ways ;) How much consultation with other members of the community is appropriate for the DPL? How prominently should an acknowledgment of those contributions be presented? I see no acknowledgments of outside input in your own platform. Did you consult with other members of the community in drafting it? (or did i miss it when i read your platform?) Thanks for keeping things stirred up, --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature