On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello developers, > > I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions". > > PROPOSAL START > ======================================================================== > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project, which have served us well since the first GR vote in 2003, > with 804 developers, nearly has much as today slightly over 1000 > developers. > > Therefore the Debian project reaffirms its attachement to the constitution > and the current General Resolutions process. > ======================================================================== > PROPOSAL END Seconded. I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion. I hope the Secretary will fix this. And if that's too much to ask, then I hope voters will read carefuly and won't fall for such an easy trick. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature