Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR
* Russ Allbery (email@example.com) [081217 01:11]:
> This is where I have a strong disagreement with Manoj and apparently with
> you. I don't think there's any justification in the constitution for
> requiring a developer statement about the project's sense of the meaning
> of the SC and the DFSG to have a 3:1 majority, or to make a developer
> override to enforce that sense of the meaning.
> Both the override and the statement about the meaning of the documents
> should require 1:1. 3:1 should only be required when the documents are
> explicitly superseded or changed, not just for making a project statement
> about their interpretation.
I don't think that overriding can be done with 1:1-majority, but has the
same requirements as changing. With the rest I however agree.