On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:13:41AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Adeodato Simó <email@example.com> writes: > > > What does §4.1.7 mean, then? Can't it be read to mean that the DPL may > > appoint a new Secretary not at end of term, if there's disagreement > > between them? > > I believe this only applies in the context of 7.2 (replacing the > secretary). This was discussed some on debian-vote earlier. > My reading of this is that 7.2 is an example or clarification of when 4.1.7 can be applied. If this is a bug in the constitution, or the original intention of it or not is open to debate, as is the interpretation of course. Neil -- <Tolimar> "Debian women - porting the most succesfull operating system to the most unknown architecture"
Description: Digital signature