Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR

[Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>]

* Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:53:29 +0200]:

> The only constitutional way to get rid of the Secretary without his consent is
> for the DPL to fail to reappoint him, which would automatically mean (since I'm
> assuming that the Secretary does not go willingly) that a replacement Secretary
> is selected by the Developers by way of General Resolution.  I'm not sure when
> the current term of the Secretary expires, but I'd guess it'd be some time
> after the next DPL election.

What does §4.1.7 mean, then? Can't it be read to mean that the DPL may
appoint a new Secretary not at end of term, if there's disagreement
between them?

Thanks,

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
                                Listening to: Rebekah del Rio - Llorando